Donald Trump has long expressed interest in taking control of Greenland.
On Thursday, he took his ambitions a step further, suggesting the U.S. might deploy troops to seize the island, which belongs to Denmark.
“I think it’ll happen,” the president said about annexing the island during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office.
Potential military action
The discussion about Greenland’s future has dramatically escalated, with Trump once again signaling his intent to bring the Arctic island under U.S. control.
What began as a proposal to buy the territory has now morphed into talks of potential military action. As tensions rise, NATO allies, including Denmark, which owns Greenland, are left wondering just how far Trump is willing to go.
Trump has repeatedly stated his desire to purchase Greenland, but Denmark’s Prime Minister, Mette Frederiksen, has made it clear the island is not for sale.
On Thursday, Trump again emphasized the U.S.’s need for Greenland for national security reasons. He even suggested that deploying American troops to take control could be an option.
“We really need it for national security. I think that is why NATO might have to get involved anyway,” he said.
Trump pointed out that the U.S. already maintains a military presence on the island, with Pituffik Space Base playing a key role in missile warning and space surveillance operations.
“We have a couple of bases on Greenland already, and we have quite a few soldiers. Maybe you will see more and more soldiers go there,” he warned.
The NATO chief’s response
During the discussion, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, seated on a couch in the Oval Office, nodded in agreement.
However, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, present in the Oval Office, showed little interest in engaging with Trump’s remarks.
Rutte made it clear he wanted no part in the debate.
“When it comes to Greenland, yes or no joining the U.S., I would leave that outside, for me, this discussion, because I don’t want to direct NATO in that,” Rutte stated, distancing the alliance from Trump’s ambitions.
Trump’s history of military ambitions
Trump has a history of considering military action to claim territories he wants for the U.S., and Greenland is no exception.
Back in January, before taking office, Trump hinted at using force not only in Greenland but also in Panama, where he expressed interest in controlling the canal.
But Greenlanders have made their stance clear. In Tuesday’s election, the center-right Demokraatit party, which strongly opposes an American takeover, won first place. While Greenland remains a Danish territory, it has significant self-rule, and the issue of independence is becoming increasingly important.
Demokraatit’s leader and incoming Prime Minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, strongly rejected Trump’s ambitions.
“We don’t want to be Americans. No, we don’t want to be Danes. We want to be Greenlanders, and we want our own independence in the future,” Nielsen told Sky News. “And we want to build our own country by ourselves.”
This election was not just a rejection of Trump; it was a clear signal that Greenlanders are serious about breaking away from Denmark and forging their own path. The winning Demokraati party has set a goal of gradually achieving independence from Denmark.
The showdown over Greenland
The conflict over Greenland raises significant questions about the future of global power, sovereignty, and U.S. ambitions. Is Trump’s push for control a strategic move or an overreach? Should NATO intervene, or does Greenland’s future lie solely in the hands of its people?
With Greenlanders making it clear they want independence — not American or Danish rule — what comes next? Will the U.S. respect their wishes, or is this just the beginning of a larger geopolitical struggle?
One thing is certain: this debate is far from over. What do you think — should Greenland stand alone, stay with Denmark, or become America’s next frontier?
